[Setup] User/group ownership: all 'plone:plone'?

[Alex Clark]

Hi

On 10/6/11 5:07 PM, hydrostarr2 wrote:
> bump.  Thoughts?


Excessive prodding is not likely to solicit the response you desire. 
It's OK to follow up your own post with additional thoughts, but please 
don't assume that because no one answers they haven't read your 
question. Rather, it's just like IRC chat support: if someone can 
answer, they will. There is no need to repeat questions or otherwise try 
to coerce members in to answering ;-).


Alex


> Would like to get this settled soon... getting close and
> closer to "production release day."  (Thx for any help.)
>
> Am considering amending proposed approach, and only changing to
> 'plone:plone' for /usr/local/Plone/zeocluster/* (and NOT
> /usr/local/Plone/zeocluster).
>
> Further, if it hasn't yet been noted: user/group ownership change was needed
> in at last one of our system installs in order for plone-based process to
> update/write/whatever properly in one of the /usr/local/Plone/zeocluster/var
> areas...fwiw.
>
>
> hydrostarr2 wrote:
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>> hydrostarr2 wrote:
>>>
>>> Any general "best practice" recommendations for user/group ownership  (in
>>> Ubuntu 10/11) of /usr/local/Plone and all its dirs/files in its tree?
>>>
>>> We've been running with inconsistent settings, and plan to standard on
>>> all 'plone:plone' for /everything/ in /usr/local/Plone.  eg:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Problems with this?  Alternative suggestions (and if so, why?)?
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/User-group-ownership-all-plone-plone-tp6860860p6867398.html
> Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
Alex Clark · http://aclark.net