[Product-Developers] status of the collective.xmpp.* packages

Guido Stevens guido.stevens at cosent.net
Thu Mar 27 15:41:49 UTC 2014

On 27/03/14 16:18, Héctor Velarde wrote:
> but another use case should be having a very simple chat using an
> existing GTalk account.
> what do you think? what would be easier, refactoring
> collective.xmpp.chat or creating a new package?

If your use case does not require the synchronization of the 
authenticated users in Plone with the user roster in xmpp, I'd say it 
will probably be easiest do do a javascript front-end xmpp client 
integration instead of a backend integration via collective.xmpp.*

     Guido Stevens  |  +31.43.3618933  |  http://cosent.nl

     s o c i a l   k n o w l e d g e   t e c h n o l o g y

More information about the Product-Developers mailing list