[Product-Developers] better than license include other package

[Andreas Jung]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
> On 2009-12-16 06:57, Manabu TERADA wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm creating a Plone-add-on-product what is able to search for
>> MS-Office
>> files.
>> The product include Apache POI. POI is Apache License 2.0.
>> The product inherit from PortalTransform.
>>
>> Which license should I better.
>> GPL or LGPL or Apache?
>
> Plone add-ons that require Plone must be GPL.
>

PortalTransforms does not seem to import Plone code (I can see only
CMFCore related imports) and the license of PortalTransforms is
not GPL..so an extension inheriting from PortalTransforms only
must not be GPL.

Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksoi4kACgkQCJIWIbr9KYypJwCfaQOwRzLRk7PaKzlqBB35tzBE
iHUAn0STPnLKgEL1Eud8ok6+AhB7+beI
=qrZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lists.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-product-developers/attachments/20091216/ea3b43aa/attachment.vcf>