[Product-Developers] Re: please recommend (or warn me off) a linux flavor that can...
duffyd at kokorice.org
Mon Mar 31 23:42:26 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 20:27 -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> PythonHack wrote:
> > Hey Plonistas
> > I FINALLY get to set up a linux box! (there is a God after all) and I
> > need to impress the bean-counters.
> > This box will be used for python/zope/plone development (and proof of
> > the stack) but I need a kickstart selecting a linux flavor.
> > I have tons of DOS/windows experience (25+ years) but virtually none of
> > unix/linux. I am confident I can learn what I need to 'on the fly' but
> > right now the OS has to 'just work' (I can't get into compiling it, etc.)
> > I need to setup multiple instances of plone 3 with zeo (via buildout) as
> > quickly as possible and with the absolute least difficulty. I may also
> > be setting up:
> > - pound with apache (it's a quad core box)
> > - entransit and/or deliverance
> > - varnish
> > I had looked at centOS and ubuntu server.
> I run a CentOS and multiple Ubuntu machines, and the CentOS one is an
> absolute PITA. Ubuntu is much simpler.
+1 on the CentOS nightmares (disclaimer: I am a CentOS n00b but am a
longtime Deb-distro user - love it ;)
> > I was about to install ubuntu server but I just noticed that it uses
> > .deb instead of .rpm. Is ubuntu going to be a limitation for me later
> > on, or are debian versions universally available?
> More so than rpms - I have far more headaches getting rpms to play nice
> together than I do with ubuntu and debs. Some days I could kill the guy
> who decided to go with CentOS.
> Just remember to completely ignore zope & plone in the package system
> (whether you use CentOS or Ubuntu) - they're practically stone-age.
> Also, put all Plone "sites" in their own zope databases (ZODB) - we didn't
> do that and retrofitting is becoming a problem... The system grew rather
> faster than expected :-)
More information about the Product-Developers