[Framework-Team] PLIP Process

[Jens W. Klein]

After some discussion I introduced the label "03 type: feature" exactly
for plips.
After some discussion the more general word "feature" was preferred and
I renamed it (I first named it "03 type: plip", but after discussions
first at at community.plone.org and then at 2015 conference we renamed it).

Enhancement is a small change with no need to PLIP.

On 2015-11-24 15:52, Ramon Navarro Bosch wrote:
> What about using this
> : http://issuetemplate.com/#/plone/Products.CMFPlone/PLIP

I did not know about issuetemplate, thats really great! Gets a +1 by me.

If we decide to use issuetemplate I propose add a short note about it to
http://docs.plone.org/develop/coredev/docs/guidelines.html and the
longer explanation to http://docs.plone.org/develop/coredev/docs/plips.html

> I would disconect dev.plone.org <http://dev.plone.org> and use the new
> plone.org <http://plone.org> (that is going to be online soon) to add
> the info we have at 
> 
> https://github.com/plone/buildout.coredev/tree/5.0/docs

Afaik there were already some date announced (Dec.31st?) when
dev.plone.org will be shut down.

Jens

> Ramon
> 
> El dt., 24 nov. 2015 a les 14:59, Johannes Raggam (<thetetet at gmail.com
> <mailto:thetetet at gmail.com>>) va escriure:
> 
>     Sorry, next FWT is December 1st, not today.
> 
> 
> 
>     On 11/24/2015 02:54 PM, Johannes Raggam wrote:
>     > Let's discuss that at the meeting. Anyways, my position:
>     >
>     >
>     > Yes, there was a decision to give up dev.plone.org
>     <http://dev.plone.org> and use github issues
>     > instead. IIRC, maurits' already made some kind-of plips:
>     >
>     > https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/issues/1008
>     > https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/issues/1198
>     >
>     > I think we should use dev.plone.org <http://dev.plone.org> as
>     entry point for developers, where
>     > the most important information/links can be found. e.g. "about the
>     PLIP
>     > process", "PLIP template", "code style guide", "how to contribute".
>     >
>     > Regarding the label, the label "04 type: enhancement" comes close
>     to be
>     > a PLIP label, but we need a specific one.
>     >
>     > We should keep our Google docs document for managing PLIPs, because
>     > github doesn't offer enough features to replace that (voting,
>     > conditional labels only valid for PLIPs, etc).
>     >
>     >
>     > Cheers,
>     >    Johannes
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > On 11/23/2015 05:04 PM, Ramon Navarro Bosch wrote:
>     >> Hey as I can remember we decided to stop dev.plone.org
>     <http://dev.plone.org>
>     >> <http://dev.plone.org> as a PLIP platform and decided to use GitHub
>     >> Issues with PLIP label. Isn't that right ? Kim was asking for
>     >> information about that on the GH and, besides
>     buildout.coredev/docs info
>     >> is outdated, I couldn't find the label on the Products.CMFPlone issue
>     >> tracker.
>     >>
>     >> What was the decided decision about PLIP process ?
>     >>
>     >> R
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Framework-Team mailing list
>     >> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
>     <mailto:Framework-Team at lists.plone.org>
>     >> https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-framework-team
>     >>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Klein & Partner KG, member of BlueDynamics Alliance