[Framework-Team] PLIP 20144

Timo Stollenwerk tisto at plone.org
Tue Dec 2 10:01:45 UTC 2014


Am 02.12.2014 um 10:57 schrieb Johannes Raggam:
> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 13:13 +0100, Philip Bauer wrote:
>> Dear Framework-team,
>>
>> I got the message that https://dev.plone.org/ticket/20144 should be moved to 5.1, which is generally ok by me but I can't help wondering why. 
>>
>> The implementation, upgrade-steps and tests are all done. Working with folderish dexterity-types in real projects has been tested by many developers for quite some time. What do you think needs more work or improvements for it to be included in Plone 5? I even migrated the test for plone.app.contentmenu (https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contentmenu/pull/8) to work with AT and DX to make sure nothing changes regarding the UI. 
>>
>> I'm more than willing to put in more time if it means having this in Plone 5.0 and not 5.1 (which will be at least a year form now). I think the point when we move from AT to DX is also the right moment to switch from itemish to folderish.
>>
>> Also: If the -1 stands: You did not answer the question about the alternative folderish profile.
> 
> I'm +1 to keep this "folderish" profile. This way, we can start using it
> immediately without depending on external addons like
> collective.folderishtypes. People will use it and we can get feedback
> for folderishtypes in Plone.

I'm -1 on this. It is confusing and I don't see a good reason why this
can not be accomplished in an add-on product. For details, see my notes
on the pull request:

https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contenttypes/pull/187

Timo


More information about the Framework-Team mailing list