[Framework-Team] Diazo ZPT fragment support

Alex Clark aclark at aclark.net
Fri Nov 2 11:33:50 UTC 2012


On 2012-11-02 08:21:50 +0000, Martin Aspeli said:

> That's the whole point: There's a PLIP for 4.3 with Diazo
> improvements, and this is part of that. Hence I'd like some review
> before I merge this part of it.


I'm not on the FWT, just trying to follow: where is that PLIP? All the 
Diazo related PLIPs I can find are closed:

- https://dev.plone.org/search?q=diazo+plip&noquickjump=1&ticket=on

> 
> On 2 November 2012 01:50, Alec Mitchell 
> <alecpm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> FWIW, I'm also -1 without this going through the PLIP process.  A
>> plugin would be fine.  Personally, I'd rather see JSON representations
>> for content and listings than either this or the contentlistings type
>> hackery.
>> 
>> Alec
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Elizabeth Leddy
>> <elizabeth.leddy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm technically not on the FWT but -1 for doing this like a bug fix. I am in
>>> agreement with djay, but more importantly we have been very good about going
>>> "add-on first, core second".  I can see this being a product bump (like
>>> tinymce is at the moment) for a good couple of months and then getting
>>> feedback on it.
>>> 
>>> 2 cents,
>>> 
>>> Liz
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Elizabeth Leddy
>>> Sent with Sparrow
>>> 
>>> On Thursday, November 1, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>> 
>>> Guys,
>>> 
>>> I'd really like some FWT input on
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/plone/plone.app.theming/pull/10
>>> 
>>> It's ready to merge, but there seems to be different opinions about merit:
>>> 
>>> * Laurence and I see it as an important way to solve a certain class
>>> of problems, where Plone's markup isn't sufficient as a base to
>>> deliver what the theme required, without having to resort to full-on
>>> filesystem development.
>>> 
>>> * Dylan is against the idea, believing most/all use cases can be
>>> adequately solved in content space with a combination of existing
>>> portlets, TinyMCE styles and add-on products
>>> 
>>> * A number of people seem to be on the fence
>>> 
>>> I'd like to merge this before it bitrots, and I think the
>>> implementation is sound. However, I think it needs some FWT discussion
>>> and approval first.
>>> 
>>> Martin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Framework-Team mailing list
>>> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
>>> https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-framework-team
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Framework-Team mailing list
>>> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
>>> https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-framework-team


-- 
Alex Clark · https://www.gittip.com/aclark4life/




More information about the Framework-Team mailing list