[Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Notes: 8 March, 2011

[Elizabeth Leddy]

> > Is there any documentation floating around on how to actually do a proper
> review?
> > I feel like I saw some at some point but I can't find it again. I think
> we need to
> > have this ready so that we don't get bad reviews from the non FWT
> reviewers.
>
> Yeah, I'd really like to see a number of PLIP documents:
>
>
Ok I started on a few and a few already exist. If anyone wants to add
anything feel free.


>    PLIP author rights and responsibilities
>    PLIP FWT Champion rights and responsibilities
>

Will hit these soon. Good idea.


>    Standard PLIP Format
>

http://dev.plone.org/plone/wiki/PLIP


>    How to do an initial PLIP review
>

I'm not even sure where to start here. Ideas?


>    How to do a PLIP implementation review
>

http://dev.plone.org/plone/wiki/PlipReview


>    When an FWT member goes AWOL
>

Lets actually talk about this at one of our next meetings. Its not so bad in
the new process, we just need to have clear rules. Maybe something like
"Taking a break from the FWT"

Liz


>
> Too much, any more?
>
> Ross
>
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Eric Steele <ems174 at psu.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     Attending: Eric Steele, Craig Haynal, Alec Mitchell, Elizabeth Leddy,
> Ross
> >     Patterson, Martijn Pieters
> >     Absent: Laurence Rowe, Rob Gietema, Matthew Wilkes
> >
> >            • Empower the release manager and PLIP authors to demand what
> they
> >     should expect from the FWT
> >            • Each PLIP should have a designated FWT champion
> >                    • Allows us to keep better track of PLIPs, AWOL FWT
> members
> >                    • PLIP authors can poke FWT champion as needed
> >                    • TODO: Make a "how to shepherd your PLIP" doc
> >            • TODO: Go through existing PLIPs to cull dead ones, find
> implementers
> >     for others
> >            • https://dev.plone.org/plone/report/24
> >            • Move existing PLIPS to "Orphaned"
> >            • Ross will contact orphaned plip implementers to see if
> they're still
> >     interested
> >            • Targets for 4.2: collections, search results, events,
> contentlisting
> >            • Eric will go through and clear out 4.1 milestone
> >            • Problem: Not all trac users have email addresses assigned.
> This was
> >     probably a part of the communication problem in 4.1.
> >                    • TODO: Get Trac user email addresses populated from
> Plone.org
> >     accts.
> >            • Eric will contact board RE: increasing team size to 10.
> >            • Eric will contact existing members to make sure they want to
> stay
> >
> >     Next call: 22 March, 2011
> >     Meeting audio:
> http://apps.calliflower.com/recording/download/12255?rec_key=
> >     9e88c163e6ef37da10d608a9ed3165b333b73ae4
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Framework-Team mailing list
> >     Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
> >     https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>
> _______________________________________________
> Framework-Team mailing list
> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
> https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-framework-team/attachments/20110308/aec33a0f/attachment-0002.html>