[Framework-Team] Reworking the PLIP Lifecycle | discussion

Ross Patterson me at rpatterson.net
Thu Feb 10 03:49:03 UTC 2011


Ross Patterson <me at rpatterson.net> writes:

> Elizabeth Leddy <eleddy at umich.edu> writes:
>
>> Thanks for all the feedback guys! Curious what current team members think???? 
>
> +1, though I expected to gather more contradicting perspectives before
> weighing in in.

Ok, so Eric I think we're a go.  Lets schedule another FWT meeting and
hammer out the details.

Liz, get ready!  :-)

Ross

>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Wichert Akkerman <
>> wichert at wiggy.net> wrote:
>>
>>     On 2011-1-16 22:46, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>    
>>         I suspect they can be overcome by release managers setting target
>>         dates, asking people to contribute to a particular milestone date for
>>         a particular planned release, but not holding up a release if people
>>         slip. Many smaller deadlines can be better than fewer big ones.
>>
>>     If you have many small deadlines they effectively become meaningless since
>>     people will just wait for the next one (to fly by). I've always tried to
>>     advocate a more continuous development pattern and I love Elizabeth's
>>     proposal.
>>    
>>     Wichert.
>>    
>>     --
>>     Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net>   It is
>>     simple to make things.
>>     http://www.wiggy.net/                  It is hard to make things simple.
>>    
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Framework-Team mailing list
>>     Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
>>     http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>
> _______________________________________________
> Framework-Team mailing list
> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team




More information about the Framework-Team mailing list