[Framework-Team] Reworking the PLIP Lifecycle | discussion
Ross Patterson
me at rpatterson.net
Thu Feb 10 03:49:03 UTC 2011
Ross Patterson <me at rpatterson.net> writes:
> Elizabeth Leddy <eleddy at umich.edu> writes:
>
>> Thanks for all the feedback guys! Curious what current team members think????
>
> +1, though I expected to gather more contradicting perspectives before
> weighing in in.
Ok, so Eric I think we're a go. Lets schedule another FWT meeting and
hammer out the details.
Liz, get ready! :-)
Ross
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Wichert Akkerman <
>> wichert at wiggy.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 2011-1-16 22:46, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>
>> I suspect they can be overcome by release managers setting target
>> dates, asking people to contribute to a particular milestone date for
>> a particular planned release, but not holding up a release if people
>> slip. Many smaller deadlines can be better than fewer big ones.
>>
>> If you have many small deadlines they effectively become meaningless since
>> people will just wait for the next one (to fly by). I've always tried to
>> advocate a more continuous development pattern and I love Elizabeth's
>> proposal.
>>
>> Wichert.
>>
>> --
>> Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net> It is
>> simple to make things.
>> http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Framework-Team mailing list
>> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
>> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>
> _______________________________________________
> Framework-Team mailing list
> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
More information about the Framework-Team
mailing list