[Framework-Team] FWT Meeting Minutes - Sept 9, 2009
Eric Steele
ems174 at psu.edu
Thu Sep 10 10:01:39 UTC 2009
Attending: Eric Steele, Alec Mitchell, Ross Patterson, Erik Rose,
David Glick
Absent: Calvin HP, Laurence Rowe, Raphael Ritz, Matthew Wilkes
* Break deadlines into chunks. Some of these need more review than
others.
* Alec will pick up #9309. Ask Vincent Fretin to guest-review.
(Later note: He's said yes.)
* Concern about failing tests. Some of this is due to things being
fixed
after PLIP branches were made.
* Really only comfortable judging PLIPs with two reviews. Some of
the simpler ones are fine with just one.
* 9250: Name change has been made. Plone 4 should use this
somewhere. Tabs? Fieldsets?
* 9258: Well tested, good package. Should dialog be inline/modal?
* 9259: In favor.
* 9295: Fairly incomplete at this point. Difficult to review. Needs
much
polish, user testing. Basic UI concepts are good. No migration from
existing collections. Ross is working on benchmarks. Candidate for
a minor
release. We'll see where they are in 2 weeks.
* 9315: Has a destination in mind, just hasn't reached it yet.
Suggest Alex find someone
to help with the non-design parts of the PLIP (failing tests,
repackaging of existing theme).
* 9329: Needs a lot of UI work, but is on the right track. Also a
candidate for a minor release if needed.
* 9285: Mostly complete. Link needs to be changed.
* 9286: Needs new CSS style for hidden portlets. Needs migration for
old static portlets.
* 9376: Optimizations made in archetypes.schemaextender have
rendered this moot.
* 9186: In favor. Do we cover files with this as well? Generally
* 9272: Don't need per item on/off. Eric updated review accordingly.
* 9284: This is really more of a bug to be fixed in CMF than
something we
should be patching in Plone.
* Eric will send out another email tossing shame and roses as
appropriate. Also request some volunteers for guest reviews.
* The above PLIPs were judged. Let implementers know that their
PLIPs have
been evaluated. They can refute any suggestions on list or in
ticket.
They'll have 2 weeks to complete the suggested changes.
After the meeting, we also waved through #9330.
Eric
More information about the Framework-Team
mailing list