[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP load test reports available

Ross Patterson me at rpatterson.net
Sun Sep 6 19:31:19 UTC 2009


Alec Mitchell <apm13 at columbia.edu> writes:

> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Eric Steele<ems174 at psu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 6, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Ross Patterson wrote:
>>>
>>> Eric Steele <ems174 at psu.edu> writes:
>>
>
>> ...
>>>>
>>>> One thing we need to keep in mind with the PLIP comparisons is that
>>>> many of them haven't merged in changes to CMFPlone and other packages
>>>> since they did their initial branches so that may be one of the
>>>> factors in their speed differences.
>>>
>>> Any chance we can get implementers to do this?
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Definitely. It'll make my life easier when merge time comes as well. I'll
>> ask them to get their branches up to date during the next implementation
>> run.
>
> I think it may make your job more difficult, because you'll have to
> separate the actual PLIP work from the merging of already committed
> code when merging PLIPs into the branch.

If so, then it's probably not worth it.  None of the valid PLIP
differences are big alarm bells.

Ross





More information about the Framework-Team mailing list