[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP load test reports available
me at rpatterson.net
Sun Sep 6 19:31:19 UTC 2009
Alec Mitchell <apm13 at columbia.edu> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Eric Steele<ems174 at psu.edu> wrote:
>> On Sep 6, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Ross Patterson wrote:
>>> Eric Steele <ems174 at psu.edu> writes:
>>>> One thing we need to keep in mind with the PLIP comparisons is that
>>>> many of them haven't merged in changes to CMFPlone and other packages
>>>> since they did their initial branches so that may be one of the
>>>> factors in their speed differences.
>>> Any chance we can get implementers to do this?
>> Definitely. It'll make my life easier when merge time comes as well. I'll
>> ask them to get their branches up to date during the next implementation
> I think it may make your job more difficult, because you'll have to
> separate the actual PLIP work from the merging of already committed
> code when merging PLIPs into the branch.
If so, then it's probably not worth it. None of the valid PLIP
differences are big alarm bells.
More information about the Framework-Team