[Framework-Team] Re: [Plone 4] PLIP #9249 Add TinyMCE as the default visual editor

Jon Stahl jonstahl at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 20:12:56 UTC 2009

Absolutely.  Getting the code into the Foundation's long-term
conservancy is very much worth doing if it's not too terribly hard.
I've not been through the process before of moving Collective code to
the Foundation, but I know Jarn has done this, so perhaps Geir can
enlighten us there on whether any additional steps are required other
than making sure all contributors have signed the Contributor


On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Alec Mitchell<apm13 at columbia.edu> wrote:
> I don't see much upside to renaming the package.  On the other hand,
> the more core Plone code that's owned by the foundation the better,
> IMO.  If Rob is willing to do the work to get all contributors to sign
> over their contributions, then it's probably worth pursuing.
> Alec
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ross Patterson<me at rpatterson.net> wrote:
>> Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net>
>> writes:
>>> On 7/27/09 1:38 PM, Rob Gietema wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I'm currently working on TinyMCE for Plone 4 and would like some
>>>> feedback on two issues:
>>>> 1) The current code base is located in the Collective. Since TinyMCE
>>>> will be the default editor in Plone 4 should I move (copy) the code base
>>>> to Plone SVN?
>>> -0
>>> I see no reason to move it.
>>>> 2) I'm currently using the Products namespace for the package. Would it
>>>> be better to switch to the plone(.app) namespace for Plone 4 (and keep
>>>> the Products.TinyMCE for Plone 3)?
>>> -1
>>> There is no benefit to moving, and this will make it harder to
>>> maintain Plone 3 and 4 trees in parallel.
>> I'm -1 to both of these, potential disruption for no benefit I can see.
>> Ross

More information about the Framework-Team mailing list