[Framework-Team] Re: Combining Search Results PLIPs
apm13 at columbia.edu
Thu Jul 2 18:16:51 UTC 2009
Would it be acceptable if we simply marked one of those PLIPs as
invalid then? Which one would be preferable? Enjoy your vacation
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Geir Bækholt · Jarn<baekholt at jarn.com> wrote:
> I am on my way to vacation with my family, and cannot do anything until
> Monday at the earliest.
> I have discussed the search results improvements with Laurens before he
> submitted his, and the two plips are accidental. They are 95% the same plip.
> I'll coordinate and make sure there will not be 2 implementations. - but if
> the plips have to be merged before Monday, someone else needs to do it.
> (feel free). Sorry abut the delay.
> Geir Bækholt
> On 2. juli 2009, at 18.52, Alec Mitchell <apm13 at columbia.edu> wrote:
>> Hello Geir and Laurens:
>> Both of your search results PLIPs (9271, 9282) were approved by the
>> Framework Team for inclusion in Plone 4.0. However, all voters
>> expressed a strong preference that the two PLIPs and the effort to
>> implement them be merged. It would not be acceptable to have two
>> competing implementations of the same feature(s) submitted for code
>> review. It is essential that you open a discussion and work together
>> to merge your efforts. Please keep the Framework Team apprised of the
>> results of your discussion by re-submitting a single combined PLIP
>> Thank you,
>> Alec Mitchell
More information about the Framework-Team