[Framework-Team] Re: [Plone 4] Zope 2.12 status

Hanno Schlichting hanno at hannosch.eu
Thu Jul 2 08:57:59 UTC 2009

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Andreas Zeidler<az at zitc.de> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:22 PM, David Glick wrote:
>> On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>>> - sort out image traversal stuff / linkintegrity (image scales are now
>>>> found
>>>> via an IPublishTraverse adapter rather than __bobo_traverse__, which
>>>> doesn't
>>>> work during non-publish traversal, so linkintegrity fails to detect that
>>>> images are linked in a document)
>>> Huh? I thought that change was only part of Archetypes trunk and not
>>> in the scope of Plone 4.

This should have read: Not in the scope of David's PLIP.

>> I haven't given a lot of attention to Archetypes yet.  We can (and
>> probably should) exclude that change.
> otoh, `plone.app.imaging` also introduces that adapter, and as it was mainly
> created as a support package for adding "image support" to `plone.app.blob`
> (did you think anyone wanted those configurable image scales? :)).  that's
> because the latter overrides the original adapter with an implementation
> based on zodb blobs.
> so i'm gonna argue for it's inclusion into plone 4, thereby bringing back
> the `IPublishTraverse` adapter.  of course, limi simply converted that old
> PSPS ticket (#7822) into a PLIP and i didn't think of adding a reference to
> that dependency, so the fwt will have a point in turning this down.  i
> should mention, though, that not being able to rely on `plone.app.imaging`
> would set back "image support" quite a bit and thereby reduce the chances of
> wrapping up blob support in time.  also, i think the configurable image
> scales have been a popular request by some (b1 had 500+ downloads in 1.5
> month ;)).
> anyway, and stopping the shameless advertising here, i think back-porting
> the traversal adapter might make sense, and since both `plone.app.imaging`
> (being a potential candidate needing this) and `plone.app.linkintegrity`
> happen to be packages i'm familiar with, i'd volunteer to help fixing the
> issue.  how's that? :)

Sounds good.

I'm just trying to stop David from doing too much, so he actually has
a chance of finishing the main big task of getting Plone 4 onto Zope
2.12 ;-)


More information about the Framework-Team mailing list