[Framework-Team] Re: A roadmap in a Trac

[Andreas Zeidler]

On Dec 26, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Alexander Limi wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:48:42 -0800, David Glick  
> <davidglick at onenw.org> wrote:
>> Have we considered how we're going to handle the search function  
>> once plone.org and trac look the same visually?  If we just use the  
>> separate search features of each product it's a bit non-ideal
>
> For now, we'll have to tolerate it, and see if we can do something  
> nicer wrt. indexing when all the other bits are in place.  
> collective.solr would be nice, but I don't want to put more moving  
> parts on plone.org until we have sanitized what's already there.

a late note:  collective.solr really is just a plugin for the indexing  
mechanism provided by collective.indexing.  iow, you can't really use  
it with something that is not zope-ish.  some parts of it could  
probably be re-used for a trac integration, though, and i suppose such  
a (trac) plugin wouldn't be too difficult either, but it would  
certainly require a separate package (you don't want to pull in all of  
plone in your trac instance anyway ;)).


andi

--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - info at zitc.de
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.1.7 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-framework-team/attachments/20090119/06dd6419/attachment.sig>