[Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

[Steve McMahon]

> +1. Plone 3 ships with NuPlone in the same way it does with CMFEditions
> or any other package, we shouldn't change this in the 3.x series.

+1 Nothing should break on a 3.x upgrade unless we've thought it
through carefully and intend to break it.


On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Hanno Schlichting <hannosch at hannosch.eu> wrote:
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg?
>>>
>>> Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight?
>>
>> Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3.
>>
>> This one should be compatible with 3.2. You can use it straight away by
>> adding Products.NuPlone to your eggs.
>>
>> The question now is how we deal with the release. We could:
>>
>>  - Add Products.NuPlone as a dependency of the Plone egg. This would
>> mean 'Plone' always comes with NuPlone, but there's no reason overt for
>> the dependency.
>
> +1. Plone 3 ships with NuPlone in the same way it does with CMFEditions
> or any other package, we shouldn't change this in the 3.x series. Please
> introduce no special handling of it.
>
> Hanno
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Framework-Team mailing list
> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>



-- 

Steve McMahon
Reid-McMahon, LLC
steve at reidmcmahon.com
steve at dcn.org