[Framework-Team] Re: PLIPs ready for review

Eric Steele ems174 at psu.edu
Mon Aug 17 23:59:16 UTC 2009


Since we've only had 4 spots claimed today, I'll put all of this  
another way... last one to get their 6 PLIPs picked has to review  
David's Zope migration. :P

Eric



On Aug 17, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Eric Steele wrote:

> The following 27 PLIPs have been indicated as being ready for review:
>
> 7822	Make standard file content types use ZODB BLOB support
> 8801	Move action icon support into actions, remove CMFActionIcons
> 8802	Move our upgrade / migration infrastructure to GenericSetup
> 8808	Require Python 2.5 or 2.6, Zope 2.12, and CMF 2.2 for Plone 4.0
> 8814	Replace SecureMailHost with a standard Zope mailhost
> 9186	Set Image IDs from Title field
> 9214	Support logins using e-mail address instead of user id
> 9249	Add TinyMCE as the default visual editor
> 9250	Add jQuery Tools to base install
> 9256	Expand variable substitution in mailing action of  
> plone.app.contentrules
> 9258	Replace Products.ATReferenceBrowserWidget with  
> archetypes.referencebrowserwidget
> 9259	Group dashboards
> 9263	GenericSetup syntax for importing Sharing page roles
> 9264	Merge backport patches from plone.app.dexterity into Plone
> 9272	Exposing and editing Dublin Core properties
> 9284	Allow views to override skin layer elements easily
> 9285	Show blocked portlets in management interface
> 9288	Improved commenting infrastructure
> 9295	Improved UI for collections (merged with 9283 for review: A  
> more lightweight backend for collections)
> 9305	Use real names instead of usernames
> 9309	Better search for East Asian (multi-byte) languages.
> 9316	Unify folder implementations
> 9321	Reimplement the search form with an eye on usability
> 9327	Unified interface for lists of content
> 9330	Add ability to choose role when adding new site members
> 9352	Search results improvements
>
> We also have 2 PLIPs that depend on the outcome of the theme PLIP  
> and will require a later review:
> 8805	Do not ship with NuPlone anymore
> 9300	Well formed, valid XHTML
>
> And two that are installer options:
> 9314	Plone "Developer Pack" option for installers
> 9322	Ensure that Plone 4 can upgrade Zope on Windows and Mac OS X  
> via binary eggs
>
> (See our spreadsheet for the full list of PLIPs http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rR4UAIObeTZtdUExfYophHw)
>
> If we stick with the 2 reviewers/PLIP that we'd discussed last week,  
> that means at least 6 reviews per FWT member. I'm going to make the  
> assumption that you'll want some help with these. I think there are  
> some cases where we'd be best served having one FWT review and one  
> external review for a PLIP. Hanno has offered to pitch in and I'd  
> like to see him review David's backporting PLIPs. Some would benefit  
> greatly from a UI team reviewer (do we need a UI review of the  
> collections work since half of the UI team worked on it?)
>
> I've also asked accessibility evangelist Christian Vinten-Johansen  
> here at WebLion to look at some of these for possible accessibility  
> issues.
>
> If there are others you'd like to bring in, let me know and I'll  
> make it happen.
>
> Our deadline for reviews is August 30. We can discuss the  
> feasibility of that during Wednesday's call.
>
> Eric





More information about the Framework-Team mailing list