[Framework-Team] Re: PLIPs ready for review
Eric Steele
ems174 at psu.edu
Mon Aug 17 23:59:16 UTC 2009
Since we've only had 4 spots claimed today, I'll put all of this
another way... last one to get their 6 PLIPs picked has to review
David's Zope migration. :P
Eric
On Aug 17, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
> The following 27 PLIPs have been indicated as being ready for review:
>
> 7822 Make standard file content types use ZODB BLOB support
> 8801 Move action icon support into actions, remove CMFActionIcons
> 8802 Move our upgrade / migration infrastructure to GenericSetup
> 8808 Require Python 2.5 or 2.6, Zope 2.12, and CMF 2.2 for Plone 4.0
> 8814 Replace SecureMailHost with a standard Zope mailhost
> 9186 Set Image IDs from Title field
> 9214 Support logins using e-mail address instead of user id
> 9249 Add TinyMCE as the default visual editor
> 9250 Add jQuery Tools to base install
> 9256 Expand variable substitution in mailing action of
> plone.app.contentrules
> 9258 Replace Products.ATReferenceBrowserWidget with
> archetypes.referencebrowserwidget
> 9259 Group dashboards
> 9263 GenericSetup syntax for importing Sharing page roles
> 9264 Merge backport patches from plone.app.dexterity into Plone
> 9272 Exposing and editing Dublin Core properties
> 9284 Allow views to override skin layer elements easily
> 9285 Show blocked portlets in management interface
> 9288 Improved commenting infrastructure
> 9295 Improved UI for collections (merged with 9283 for review: A
> more lightweight backend for collections)
> 9305 Use real names instead of usernames
> 9309 Better search for East Asian (multi-byte) languages.
> 9316 Unify folder implementations
> 9321 Reimplement the search form with an eye on usability
> 9327 Unified interface for lists of content
> 9330 Add ability to choose role when adding new site members
> 9352 Search results improvements
>
> We also have 2 PLIPs that depend on the outcome of the theme PLIP
> and will require a later review:
> 8805 Do not ship with NuPlone anymore
> 9300 Well formed, valid XHTML
>
> And two that are installer options:
> 9314 Plone "Developer Pack" option for installers
> 9322 Ensure that Plone 4 can upgrade Zope on Windows and Mac OS X
> via binary eggs
>
> (See our spreadsheet for the full list of PLIPs http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rR4UAIObeTZtdUExfYophHw)
>
> If we stick with the 2 reviewers/PLIP that we'd discussed last week,
> that means at least 6 reviews per FWT member. I'm going to make the
> assumption that you'll want some help with these. I think there are
> some cases where we'd be best served having one FWT review and one
> external review for a PLIP. Hanno has offered to pitch in and I'd
> like to see him review David's backporting PLIPs. Some would benefit
> greatly from a UI team reviewer (do we need a UI review of the
> collections work since half of the UI team worked on it?)
>
> I've also asked accessibility evangelist Christian Vinten-Johansen
> here at WebLion to look at some of these for possible accessibility
> issues.
>
> If there are others you'd like to bring in, let me know and I'll
> make it happen.
>
> Our deadline for reviews is August 30. We can discuss the
> feasibility of that during Wednesday's call.
>
> Eric
More information about the Framework-Team
mailing list