[Plone-developers] [Framework-Team] Re: Plone 3.2 and 3.3 planning

[Tom Lazar]

On 18.09.2008, at 05:04, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously Tom Lazar wrote:
>> if any of my previous conferences and sprints are an indicator, i  
>> just
>> *know* that i won't be doing any actual fwt review work while in DC.
>> but that's not important. review work is 'fleissarbeit' to use a nice
>> german term here and can easily be done alone, whenever one can find
>> some time. i'd like to use the time at the conference to discuss
>> actual ideas/plips and to brainstorm the future fwt process, so i  
>> have
>> no problem with a post-conference plip deadline (although, it
>> shouldn't be too far after the conference as to not remove momentum
>> from the ideas/plips that have been fleshed out during the  
>> conference.
>> so, i guess, i'm +1 on wichert's deadline of one week after the
>> conference. in fact, i think it's pretty much perfect...
>
> Keep in mind that at this stage the review will not involve code at  
> all,
> only ideas/proposals.

right, i failed to consider that...

> Which seems to fit with what you're doing at the
> conference  :)

absolutely! bring it on ;-)
>
>
> Wichert.
>
> -- 
> Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net>    It is simple to make things.
> http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things  
> simple.
>