[Framework-Team] Re: Merged PLIPs 184, 200, 202, 203 and 204
optilude at gmx.net
Tue Feb 26 08:26:24 UTC 2008
George Lee wrote:
>> I've made changes to
>> - ploneout 3.0 branch (switching to maintenance 1.0 branches for
>> plone.contentrules, plone.app.contentrules and plone.app.form)
>> - ploneout 3.1 branch (adding plone.portlet.static and
>> plone.portlet.collection to the buildout)
> How about ploneout trunk to include the static and collection portlets?
Well spotted. I forgot. ;)
I can't do this for a couple of days, so if someone wants to merge the
relevant changes in the meantime, I'd be grateful.
>> The merge for plone.app.portlets was a bit tricky since I got a lot of
>> conflicts with George's changes to the GS handlers. His tests and mine
>> both pass without modification (almost), so that's good. However, it'd
>> be nice if George could take a look at my changes.
>> It probably also makes sense to extend my test_configuration.py test
>> case with some more examples that cover George's new GS syntax. This is
>> overlapping with, but different to George's test_exportimport.xml (his
>> tests the handles directly, mine is an integration test that actually
>> loads a profile and then export it again). George, would you be up for
>> that? It should be pretty simple.
> I won't be able to do anything until the weekend but am happy to look at it
> then. I'll try to pick a key few examples that don't duplicate too much what's
> going on.
I think it's fine, I'd just like to make sure you're happy with the
final state of things.
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
More information about the Framework-Team