[Framework-Team] The final(?) verdict

[Andreas Zeidler]

On Feb 20, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
> Andreas Zeidler wrote:
>> in short:  i like the idea, but i'm -1 on including this _now_.
>
> Note that I said "-4 - never submitted".

yes, i know :)

> My remark was triggered by looking at
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/216
> and realizing that we were all positive on
> this in principle and then I started wondering
> whether that could have been interpreted as
> acceptance already because in contrast to most
> other PLIPs there is hardly any implementation
> involved (for the minimal solution at least).

but the code (in jbot) would have needed a review as well, so i  
couldn't have been accepted for inclusion at that point.

> Considering that all our conversations here are
> archived and discoverable by search later on I thought
> in include PLIPs that were initially considered even
> though they finally never got submitted in the overview
> as well as adding comments where I deemed appropriate.

yes, and imho that was a good idea.

> This was not meant to question our current judgment
> though I now realize that I phrased it as such.

no, it didn't really come across that way — it said "note" after all. :)

cheers,


andi

--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - info at zitc.de
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.0.6 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-framework-team/attachments/20080221/2693b031/attachment.sig>