[Framework-Team] Re: [Plone-developers] scope of reviews was: Re: Updated PLIP review deadline
az at zitc.de
Fri Feb 15 23:57:54 UTC 2008
On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Tom Lazar wrote:
> interesting point. maybe that's what's holding me back personally
> (only finished one review up until now, buildout of the second one
> running as i'm writing this). i was under the impression that a review
> consisted of 'serious QA',
so did i...
> ie. hunting down the individual revisions
> that make up the plip and looking at the diffs; doing manual
> clicktests on FF, Safari, Win IE 6/7, including migrations then
> discussing any bugs that come up with the author and see their fixes
> through until resolution (with possibly bouncing unacceptable fixes
> back to the author once or twice).
...and that's basically what i tried to do with my reviews.
> that stuff can amount to some serious time, i can tell you.
indeed, mine took me something between two and four or maybe even five
> but OTOH
> i've read things like, "it usually only takes 20-30 minutes" for a
> review, what gives?
i suppose this also needs a better definition in terms of how deep a
review is supposed to go.
> maybe i'm just taking this *too* seriously and thereby (ironically)
> actually holding the whole process *back*.
i wouldn't necessarily think so — like i said, it was the same for me.
> anyway, i'd be interested to hear some feedback on this, in the
> meantime i'll be doing another review ;-)
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - info at zitc.de
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.0.5 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Framework-Team