[Framework-Team] Re: Re: PLIPs 208 and 217 Ready for Review

[Florian Schulze]

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:41:40 +0100, Andreas Zeidler  
<az at zitc.de> wrote:

> On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> -1 to renaming everthing plone.*. When things begin outside Plone
>> (which we should encourage), then we can't necessarily insist that
>> they are called plone.* (in fact, we'd probably discourage it if it
>> wasn't intended to be eventually destined for the core).
>
> i completely agree.  furthermore, i think using non plone.* packages
> in plone emphasizes one of the points made in the whole wsgi/repoze
> approach and the plone. (as opposed to plone.app.) namespace, which is
> that re-usability is a good thing and we'd like other people outside
> the plone/zope universe to start looking and potentially using our
> stuff as well.  in that sense i think we should actually make a
> statement by integrating packages from the "outside world".  and yes,
> that's not particularly true in this case, but at least it looks this
> way... ;)

I'm also +1 on cooperation instead of assimilation (small pun on borg :P).

Regards,
Florian Schulze