[Framework-Team] Re: PLIPs 208 and 217 Ready for Review

[Andreas Zeidler]

On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> -1 to renaming everthing plone.*. When things begin outside Plone
> (which we should encourage), then we can't necessarily insist that
> they are called plone.* (in fact, we'd probably discourage it if it
> wasn't intended to be eventually destined for the core).

i completely agree.  furthermore, i think using non plone.* packages  
in plone emphasizes one of the points made in the whole wsgi/repoze  
approach and the plone. (as opposed to plone.app.) namespace, which is  
that re-usability is a good thing and we'd like other people outside  
the plone/zope universe to start looking and potentially using our  
stuff as well.  in that sense i think we should actually make a  
statement by integrating packages from the "outside world".  and yes,  
that's not particularly true in this case, but at least it looks this  
way... ;)


andi

--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - info at zitc.de
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.0.5 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-framework-team/attachments/20080201/3f3de129/attachment.sig>