[Framework-Team] PLIP evaluation and structure, and Framework Team transparency
G.J.Perrin at bton.ac.uk
Thu Dec 18 14:59:15 UTC 2008
On 18 Dec 2008, at 11:13, Tom Lazar wrote:
> in the end it comes down to how much we all care about plone (about
> which there can be no doubt regarding the new team) and the
> collective wisdom of the entire(!) community (which is completely
> independent from the fwt composition).
> but perhaps we could make the 'UI impact component' a formal part of
> the evaluation of a PLIP, i.e. add it as a formal part of the
> structure of a PLIP (in addition to the current ones such as
> Deliverables, Participants etc.)
Recently, it was proper for voting or whatever to be held in private.
Now, IMHO it's sufficient for Team members discuss/decide, publicly,
how best to make the PLIP routine work *for them* -- and for the
[√] The discussion is occurring.
[√] People who are not members of the Team are permitted to address
[√] The level of publicity is currently sufficient; addressing plone-developers at lists.sourceforge.n
et causes the discussion to appear at <http://plone.org/support/forums>.
[x] The level of publicity is not always what it should be; <http://plone.org/support/lists
> and <http://plone.org/support/forums> omit <http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
To address the latter, <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2008-November/002430.html
>> Framework Team transparency
More information about the Framework-Team