[Framework-Team] Re: Re: Framework Team Page Needs Updating

Tom Lazar lists at tomster.org
Fri Aug 29 19:27:54 UTC 2008

just for the record: the way i recall things, all current members  
pretty much agreed from the start to follow up until 3.2. now it  
seems, that that, which was originally (albeit vaguely) planned for  
3.2 will be split up into 3.2 and 3.3.

i'm certainly happy to serve on the board until 3.3 and i'm looking  
forward to our meeting in dc!



On 21.08.2008, at 22:27, Andreas Zeidler wrote:

> On Aug 21, 2008, at 2:31 AM, Alexander Limi wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:12:53 -0700, Andreas Zeidler <az at zitc.de>  
>> wrote:
>>> hmm, i guess i must have somehow missed the discussion that lead to
>>> that consensus (this is not meant to sound cynical or anything,  
>>> btw).
>>> there was some talk right after 3.1, and of course there were  
>>> plans to
>>> write things down in order to improve the process for the future.  i
>>> might very well have missed parts of any more recent discussion, but
>>> as a member of the (currently still active) 3.1 team, i'm wondering
>>> why i don't really seem to know about this consensus.  or was it  
>>> just
>>> an "effective" one, i.e. one that sort of came up because the
>>> discussion was never really finished?
>> That's what "consensus" means, at least in casual English.
> hmm, i guess the meaning that had been stuck in my head is slightly  
> different, but well... :)
>> To be more precise, there wasn't a "we will do it this way, period"  
>> decision, but most people seemed to think it was a good idea, and I  
>> didn't see anyone express strong opinions otherwise.
> i did express some concerns, albeit not strong and not on the list  
> (or otherwise "online") either.  anyway, i think we should at least  
> ask the current members if they're up for it, no?  i for one would  
> happily help reviewing PLIPs again, but i won't be spokesperson  
> again nor do any of the other housekeeping, like poking people,  
> writing summaries and status updates etc.  that work caused quite a  
> bit of stress and irritation, simply since it took a significant  
> amount of extra time.  i still think we should have an extra team  
> member for this, i.e. organizing the team and the reviews and making  
> sure things happen in time, at least more or less...
> cheers,
> andi
> --
> zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - info at zitc.de
> friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
> pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
> plone 3.1.4 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone/
> _______________________________________________
> Framework-Team mailing list
> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team

More information about the Framework-Team mailing list