[Framework-Team] Re: Framework Team Page Needs Updating

Steve McMahon steve at dcn.org
Wed Aug 20 22:40:30 UTC 2008


SteveM chiming in to say that I still hope that we can get together a
face-to-face framework team meeting in DC. I'll be happy to act as scribe
and record the discussion.

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Andreas Zeidler <az at zitc.de> wrote:

> On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:06 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
>> Alexander Limi wrote:
>>
>>> Are there only 5 members? I thought there were more. If not, ignore me.
>>> :)
>>>
>>
> *ignore* :)
>
>  They have been lots of members who served on former teams, though.
>>
>
> imho there should be pages telling about the previous teams.
>
>  I think the general consensus is to keep the 3.0 team for Plone 3.3 (for
>>>
>>
> to be nit-picky:  the 3.0 team is different from the 3.1 team, except for
> raphael. :)
>
>  continuity), and elect a new FWT for 4.0 — and some overlap would be
>>> good, to make sure the lessons learned from the 3.x releases will be
>>> carried over.
>>>
>>
>> I think the consensus has indeed been to keep the same team for the 3.x
>> releases, unless someone wants to step down for any reason.
>>
>
> hmm, i guess i must have somehow missed the discussion that lead to that
> consensus (this is not meant to sound cynical or anything, btw).  there was
> some talk right after 3.1, and of course there were plans to write things
> down in order to improve the process for the future.  i might very well have
> missed parts of any more recent discussion, but as a member of the
> (currently still active) 3.1 team, i'm wondering why i don't really seem to
> know about this consensus.  or was it just an "effective" one, i.e. one that
> sort of came up because the discussion was never really finished?
>
> please don't get me wrong, but i'm not aware of any conclusions or
> decisions the current team — or the community for that matter — has made
>  about staying the same or not, making changes to the process, having
> external reviewers and/or some sort of a project lead who is responsible for
> communication and timely reviews and probably many more ideas that were
> brought up...  i'd like to have some, or let's rather say most of these
> questions discussed and settled before the 3.3 framework team starts
> working.
>
>  For 4.0 we do indeed need a new team. I for one would be happy to serve
>> on that team again :)
>>
>
> +1
>
> cheers,
>
>
> andi
>
> --
> zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - info at zitc.de
> friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
> pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
> plone 3.1.4 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Framework-Team mailing list
> Framework-Team at lists.plone.org
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>
>


-- 

Steve McMahon
Reid-McMahon, LLC
steve at reidmcmahon.com
steve at dcn.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-framework-team/attachments/20080820/fd70d8a1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Framework-Team mailing list