[Framework-Team] Re: wicked integration w/ plone 3

[Alexander Limi]

On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:54:36 -0800, Martin Aspeli  
<optilude at gmx.net> wrote:

> Emphasis on "we ship". I would strongly -1 having this on for every
> RichField in every product (i.e. do it at the AT level), which is how I
> read it the first time. Doing it for Document, News Item and Event is
> probably sensible though.

Absolutely.

> The point is that it will always create
> Documents (I assume); you won't get news items from wiki'ing news items
> and so on (which is probably not what you'd expect).

It should give you the choice, if there are several types of content  
available in that location.

>> One of the cases I could think of would be programming, things like  
>> setMethod(( blah )). Does wicked parse inside <pre> and <code> tags?
>
> Good point. We probably will find a few more of those. Even if that's
> pretty lame python. ;)

Lame Python is what I do best, baby!

-- 
Alexander Limi · http://limi.net