[Framework-Team] Re: preliminary results for PLIP selection & call for votes!

[Ricardo Newbery]

On Dec 23, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:

>> To be clear, I believe the only -1 vote on #187 was primarily due to
>> some concerns about the shortage of detail in the PLIP text.  A
>> concern I share.  I'm hoping Sidnei fleshes out the details  
>> soon.  :-)
>
> I would gladly answer any questions. The PLIP doesn't have much detail
> because there ain't much to be detailed. The branch achieves the first
> bullet under 'Proposal', and the third bullet was addressed and
> released in a Zope release. The second bullet has resulted in some
> research and I'm waiting for confirmation from Nate Aune that the
> proposed fix for it works.
>
> I have not addressed versioning because I didn't know there was any
> concern about it. I saw the comment #3 but my assumption was that
> whoever implemented versioning did it in such a way that it would
> interact correctly with WebDAV, but did not have the time to verify
> such assumption.
>
> Feel free to ask more questions...
>


Thanks Sidnei,

What is the proposed (unconfirmed) fix for the second bullet (the OS  
X resource fork issue)?

Ric