[Framework-Team] Re: voting process

[Andreas Zeidler]

On Dec 20, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
> BTW: I started to add some comments in my voting comments ;-)

i've already notices. :)

> Any chance we can have the comments added to plips be
> forwarded to this list?

that wouldn't really work now that we've already started adding  
comments.

> I would very much preer to have this list updated as soon
> as possible as we might waste a lot of time and create a
> lot of confusion if we need to figure out which of all
> the plips around is meant to be submitted for 3.1

all the plips had to be submitted through the framework list, so it  
shouldn't be too hard to go through and double check / update the  
list.  it's tedious, i know, but someone's got to do it.  i'd do it  
again, but won't have time until tomorrow, which is pretty late in the  
process.  so can you guys coordinate who's gonna be the one?

>>> 3. How many votes do we consider necessary for acceptance
>>> or rejection? Ideally, all members should vote on all PLIPs
>>> but what if not? What if people disagree?
>> all members should vote on all plips.  if not, i'll be responsible  
>> to _remind_ them, i suppose... :)  and in case we don't agree i  
>> think we should discuss matters before possibly resolving into a  
>> majority vote.  that's just my opinion, though — other thoughts are  
>> welcome!
>
> Fine with me

how was that handled by the old team, btw?  martin?

cheers,


andi

--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - info at zitc.de
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.0.4 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-framework-team/attachments/20071220/f66395f9/attachment.sig>