[Framework-Team] Re: five.intid compatible with five.localsitemanager

[Martin Aspeli]

Ross Patterson wrote:
> "Kapil Thangavelu" <k_vertigo at objectrealms.net> writes:
> 
>> could explain why this change is nesc. to make five.intid work with
>> five.lsm?
> 
> FiveSiteManager doesn't cooperate with the resolution order of
> PersistentComponents.  For example a FiveSiteManagers utility registry
> has no __bases__ attribute which raises an error in
> zope/interface/ro.py:60.  So if a site that uses localsitemanager (such
> as Plone) is instantiated *after* the FiveSiteManager has been setup at
> the application root by add_intids, then this error occurs.

Is that not just a bug in five.lsm?

> Also, the registerUtility call in add_intids uses the old API and so
> that raises an error when add_intids tries to register the IntIds
> utility for a localsitemanager.

Yes, you'd need to port the code to Zope 2.10-style persistent 
components (which is easy). I did think and hope that five.lsm would 
play with this, though.

Martin