[Framework-Team] Re: 3.0 shouldn't just be about the user facing UI
ra at burningman.com
Fri Mar 17 18:28:10 UTC 2006
On Mar 17, 2006, at 3:18 AM, Rocky Burt wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 21:13 +0000, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:18:20 -0000, whit
>> <d.w.morriss at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> just to piggy back a bit on this:
>>> I think one consideration that needs to be made is how much you guys
>>> want to start pursuing new style development. By the time Plone 3
>>> ships, CMF 2.0 will have full customization of views(the
>>> technology is
>>> not far off as we stand now).
>> Really? Can you elaborate on how this would work?
> Careful about saying this. The last word I got from Philip was the
> they had done at the sprint for TTW customization (and there was a
> of work done) would require Zope 3.3. Will Plone 3.0 be able to
> a minimum of Zope 2.10 (which will use z3.3) ?
i don't think we'll be able to require Z2.10, but at the very least
we'll be able to support 2.10. i'm personally okay w/ having certain
features require a specific Zope version, if there's a clean upgrade
More information about the Framework-Team