[Framework-Team] Re: 3.0 shouldn't just be about the user facing UI

Rob Miller ra at burningman.com
Fri Mar 17 18:28:10 UTC 2006


On Mar 17, 2006, at 3:18 AM, Rocky Burt wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 21:13 +0000, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:18:20 -0000, whit
>> <d.w.morriss at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> just to piggy back a bit on this:
>>>
>>> I think one consideration that needs to be made is how much you guys
>>> want to start pursuing new style development.  By the time Plone 3
>>> ships, CMF 2.0 will have full customization of views(the  
>>> technology is
>>> not far off as we stand now).
>>
>> Really? Can you elaborate on how this would work?
>
> Careful about saying this.  The last word I got from Philip was the  
> work
> they had done at the sprint for TTW customization (and there was a  
> bunch
> of work done) would require Zope 3.3.  Will Plone 3.0 be able to  
> require
> a minimum of Zope 2.10 (which will use z3.3) ?

i don't think we'll be able to require Z2.10, but at the very least  
we'll be able to support 2.10.  i'm personally okay w/ having certain  
features require a specific Zope version, if there's a clean upgrade  
path.

-r




More information about the Framework-Team mailing list