[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP wishlists towards 3.0

Martin Aspeli optilude at gmx.net
Mon Mar 13 21:23:45 UTC 2006

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:51:38 -0000, Rocky Burt  
<rocky.burt at adaptivewave.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 18:13 +0000, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Agree. That said, PlonePortlets are about more than that - they make  
>> portlets
>> into proper content types that can be workflowed, and have permissions  
>> for
>> things like who sees them in what contexts. I think some brainstorming  
>> with
>> Geir and Helge would be good, but I agree that using Z3 views at the  
>> very
>> least would be the way to go here.
> A little clarification here.  Viewlets (that I mentioned) are not z3
> views.  They're an implementation of the java JCP portlets specification
> for z3.  Stephan Richter seems to be a runner for this one.

Interesting. Are they actually the same, or just a port/clone?  
Interoperability with a major standard would be a major boon. Any examples  
or more info on how'd they'd work?



More information about the Framework-Team mailing list