[Framework-Team] Re: Revisited: Some preliminary Plone 3.0 profiling results
optilude at gmx.net
Thu Dec 7 23:26:45 UTC 2006
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Alexander Limi wrote:
>>> The portlets also seem to be inefficient both for logged in or not,
>>> but a lot of this time is spent in classic.pt, which we should be able
>>> to eliminate (since we should convert all the portlets to new-style
>>> portlets before shipping the release). I'm not sure if column.pt
>>> wraps/includes the classic.pt time.
>> Not sure how many portlets are still "classic", I saw that Hanno was
>> working on the calendar portlet.
> And while I was on it, I converted the last remaining classic portlets
> as well, so the calls to classic.pt are gone now.
Great Hanno, thank you very much!
> My simple benchmark shows a boost in performance from 4.0 requests/sec
> to 5.2 requests/sec for a newly created site, which is now finally a tad
> bit faster then the Plone 2.5 branch.
Wasn't it 6 requests/sec before?
> Could you re-run your test suite, to give us some updated in-depth numbers?
Please do, limi!
More information about the Framework-Team