[Evangelism] Austin fiasco

Nate Aune natea at jazkarta.com
Thu Jan 25 02:20:31 UTC 2018


I don't know if this list is still alive/active, but I just came across
this post and thought it was interesting to share how the City of Austin
has evolved their thinking about a CMS solution:
https://medium.com/@mateoclarke/open-source-city-cms-part-1-607a58b32356


On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Dylan Jay <djay at pretaweb.com> wrote:

>
> On 21/12/2009, at 12:28 PM, Dylan Jay wrote:
>
> ...
>> Another take home idea from this: if your government is putting out
>> tenders that exclude opensource and Plone specifically, creating waves can
>> get results. Especially if you can link it to jobs going elsewhere.
>>
>
> My use of the words "creating waves" is a little too strong for what I
> meant. The way in which we and others in opensource here have done this is
> to talk to those in government about removing requirements in their
> procurement processes that specifically excluded opensource solutions.
> Government to some extent have been responsive to this. This has taken a
> long time and is really just about helping them understand that other
> models exist and they can get significant benefits by considering them
> fairly along with their existing solutions. Governments respond to the
> concept of openness and fairness (and some may respond to the concept of
> local jobs but that hasn't been our experience). They respond precisely
> because they want to avoid what happened in Austin.
> I didn't mean to suggest what those Austin guys did was the right way of
> going about it. If the tender has been written it's generally too late to
> do anything.
>
>
>
>
>> On 18/12/2009, at 6:13 PM, Matt Hamilton wrote:
>>
>> Mark,
>>> What is the best way of us handling this? That article makes some harsh
>>> comments about Plone. If Plone were some large corporate I would imagine
>>> that lawyers would be swinging into action now.
>>>
>>> Do we want to publish some kind of official statement in response? Or
>>> privately contact that newspaper and ask them to retract their comment. It
>>> is a quote though so I don't know legal standing. Or do we just keep our
>>> head down and not draw attention to it?
>>>
>>> http://www.statesman.com/news/texas/local-firm-to-start-city
>>> -web-site-redesign-129437.html
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Evangelism mailing list
>>> Evangelism at lists.plone.org
>>> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evangelism mailing list
> Evangelism at lists.plone.org
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism
>



-- 


Nate Aune - natea at jazkarta.com
http://www.jazkarta.com
+1 (617) 517-4953
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-evangelism/attachments/20180124/dd525842/attachment.html>


More information about the Evangelism mailing list