[Plone-conference] Why nuke the 2014 site?
cbc at unc.edu
Tue Sep 15 20:31:07 UTC 2015
On 9/15/2015 2:51 PM, T. Kim Nguyen wrote:
> Should we add a stipulation that future conference (and other
> PF-sanctioned event) proposals must include having the event web site
> set up so it can be (and is) transferred to the PF to ensure future
> access to the content?
I can't tell you how frustrating it is to go looking for past conference
material, schedules, speakers, history, etc..
But you have to understand first, what is the PF going to do with it?,
in order to make such requirements.
We have always been bad at our own content management. :$
> I decided to move the PSM13 and PSM14 sites off UW Oshkosh servers (to a
> Linode I run) to try to better preserve them. What could we do now to
> preserve these and other sites?
I guess it's asking too much to run them to begin with on
Chris Calloway, Applications Analyst
UNC Renaissance Computing Institute
100 Europa Drive, Suite 540, Chapel Hill, NC 27517
More information about the Plone-conference