[Plone-conference] Why nuke the 2014 site?

Chris Calloway cbc at unc.edu
Tue Sep 15 20:31:07 UTC 2015

On 9/15/2015 2:51 PM, T. Kim Nguyen wrote:
> Should we add a stipulation that future conference (and other
> PF-sanctioned event) proposals must include having the event web site
> set up so it can be (and is) transferred to the PF to ensure future
> access to the content?

I can't tell you how frustrating it is to go looking for past conference 
material, schedules, speakers, history, etc..

So yes.

But you have to understand first, what is the PF going to do with it?, 
in order to make such requirements.

We have always been bad at our own content management. :$

> I decided to move the PSM13 and PSM14 sites off UW Oshkosh servers (to a
> Linode I run) to try to better preserve them. What could we do now to
> preserve these and other sites?

I guess it's asking too much to run them to begin with on 
community/foundation infrastructure?


Chris Calloway, Applications Analyst
UNC Renaissance Computing Institute
100 Europa Drive, Suite 540, Chapel Hill, NC 27517
(919) 599-3530

More information about the Plone-conference mailing list