[Plone-com] We need a new modern theme for plone.com.
aclark at aclark.net
Fri Sep 7 15:21:02 UTC 2012
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Armin Stroß-Radschinski <
maillist.acsr at acsr.de> wrote:
> The only request that I have related to Plone.com, is that it works for
> the job (and that is not an objective). If they step up and can create a
> fast solution, we should get a grip on that. Is there the targetgroup
> definition in place? Do we have a moodchart where to go for emotionally?
> This should be a suggestion for a professional starting point for them, but
> not be part of a discussion.
> With Plone and Diazo final finetuning is a snap. The quality should be
> state of the art and meet some expectations. If they (You!) could quickly
> write up some points they can meet with success, it would help a lot to
> gain speed.
> Good design can let you feel the quality of the product. This is not a
> matter of eye candy. We should aim at that and it should be a little
> "Plonish". I still wear my Plone Conf shirts from 2004 by clearnoodle
> design at night. And I sleep well ;-)
> This is the only points I have in mind. The rest is CONTENT and content
> Very important (from disasters in the past with other projects, aka ZOPE):
> Make sure all rights of the design are fully transferred to the Plone
> Foundation and there is no "Reservation" attitude for design decisions in
> the follow up.
+1 Speaking of that: IIUC, we can move content from plone.org to plone.com,
if it's not in the documentation area because all contributed documentation
there is owned by the respective author. I could be wrong, but that
approach makes sense to me. Ultimately I suppose all contributed content on
plone.org is owned by the respective author, but their is (or should be?) a
distinction between "Plone organization generated content" and "user
CC'ing the board in case there is anything they can do to help. Dear PF
Board: we desperately need to sort out all of the content ownership of
plone.org/documentation, even if that means contacting each of the
individual authors. I suspect it also means the Plone Contributor Agreement
needs to have a "contributed documentation" clause? Some folks are working
on the new contributor agreement I think, so maybe they already have this
covered (also CC: Jon Stahl, Eleddy)
> No worry, It is just the contemporary appearance!
> Am 04.09.2012 um 17:45 schrieb Elizabeth Leddy:
> On Sep 4, 2012, at 8:05 AM, André Nogueira wrote:
>>> We talk a lot about plone.com with one of our partners during Plone
>>> Symposium South America, and this company offered to do the Design for
>>> new plone.com. The company is TV1.com, they have designed all major
>>> governments Plone websites here in Brazil, like:
>>> They are very interested in contribute with Plone, and this a great
>>> way to contribute.
>>> If no one is against the idea, I can start the process with them
>>> All we need to do is organize all information we have and all we need
>>> in our nem website.
>> I don't see any reason why this shouldn't be done. Can any one come up
>> with objections? Not only does it save us time but it gives them a chance
>> to give back.
>> As far as marketing material, Rose, Armin, Derrick - do you feel
>> comfortable writing this stuff or is this something that we should
>> seriously consider farming out? My unfortunate educated guess is that
>> nothing really exists yet but please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>> Andre Nogueira
>>> andre at simplesconsultoria.com.**br <andre at simplesconsultoria.com.br>
>>> Simples Consultoria
>>> Tel. (11) 3898-2121
>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Alex Clark <aclark at aclark.net> wrote:
>>>> As far as I can tell, this has not been discussed so:
>>>> Who wants to donate a new-modern-theme to the plone.com project? To get
>>>> started, we're going to use the existing plone.org theme
>>>> but we hope to replace
>>>> that with something better/newer later. If you have any ideas, please
>>>> let us
>>>> know. Ideally the theme requirements would be something like:
>>>> Based on Twitter bootstrap (but does not appear to be based on
>>>> Responsive (included with bootstrap)
>>>> But any and all theme donations will be considered and appreciated.
>>>> Alex Clark · http://pythonpackages.com
>>>> Plone-com mailing list
>>>> Plone-com at lists.plone.org
>>> Plone-com mailing list
>>> Plone-com at lists.plone.org
>> Plone-com mailing list
>> Plone-com at lists.plone.org
> Starting point: https://plone.org/community/**teams/plone.com-development<https://plone.org/community/teams/plone.com-development>
> Trello collaboration: https://trello.com/board/**plone-com/**
> Staging site: http://plonecom.netsightdev.**co.uk/<http://plonecom.netsightdev.co.uk/>
> Code: https://github.com/collective/**plonecom-buildout<https://github.com/collective/plonecom-buildout>
> Plone-com mailing list
> Plone-com at lists.plone.org
Alex Clark · http://pythonpackages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Plone-com