[Plone-com] We need to select a plone.com production hosting provider

[Alex Clark]

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Wyn Williams <heywyn at gmail.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Well I guess thats that then as long as SFU are up for it.
>
> I registered my objections and lets move on, it would make sense to A:
> Make sure SFU are up for it as it should NOT be hosted on the same
> server as plone.org, it is poorly maintained and a bit of a mess.
>


IIRC Martior is working with SFU to move to a new host, Carol can you
confirm?



>
> A new VM should be supplied if they are wactually willing to do it (I
> asume they are being core ploners etc but we have had nothing back
> from them)
>
> YO SFU ! Heads up !
>


I assume so as well, and worst case we can launch it on plone.org and move
it later. I think we need SFU to clarify:


   - Can we host plone.com with SFU? (assume yes)
   - Can we host it on separate box from plone.org (not as sure, but I
   still assume yes especially if VM)


I think Wyn makes a good point about avoiding losing both sites at the same
time. It might be nice to move both plone.org and plone.com to new separate
VMs @ SFU for launch time.



Alex





>
> Wyn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 09/06/2012 09:42 AM, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> > On 6 Sep 2012, at 07:28 AM, Wyn Williams <heywyn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Hello all I already supply a number of higher spec servers for
> >> the Plone community so I could also take on Plone.com, however..
> >>
> >> I would really prefer not to use SFU for Plone.com for several
> >> reasons;
> >>
> >> 1) They host plone.org - any problems at there DC and we lose
> >> both portals (not good)
> >
> > That is a very valid point, but actually seeing as neither sure us
> > a mirror of the other, does it *really* matter?
> >
> >> 2) It is already at Netsight, if they have the spare resources to
> >> move it to it's own VM and allow the AI team access (or say they
> >> will take care of any issues host side) then it gives us at least
> >> one portal should shit happen.
> >
> > Netsight could well host it, but tbh I'd rather just stick it with
> > SFU along with Plone.org rather than add extra to the mix.
> >
> >
> >> 3) SFU Are a good host but lets face it, they use FreeBSD so are
> >> a little suspect...
> >
> > We use FreeBSD to, so we also dance with the devil in the pale
> > blinking led light.
> >
> >
> >> PS Matt, what it the Netsight response to permanent hosting ?
> >
> > Go with SFU.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> >
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQSEbeAAoJEIPbcx1gQ7cimR8H/1zOuZgqz6GquE+1zHgOcxBI
> MRCcqwhHUPcW305Jl3aEa+AXjEw/0O2qtCNdJPeiOirCA9MA5SJQVJ0iAV8XULEE
> jzSu0Qj1+5av3ete/AeGo3doT+YkVnSyWfPKL5nTraX6asSRos7/TRf8Oi2JFxMV
> TJNQQFjz4Jp98bwLXM+6f6efEm8Ux4nBuByfNz9dgpvvZs89WLtyHL3e66PPliMs
> P3LadqZiWY6YiTLSIVxmU3ukamoflIZ/a4Ix4XCBc/Iw6LloI0jR3M1UxXpK/zDg
> BT2WQ2dq/xpJzKohoZDkoXGqqcbOCF4bpTk73WdGiy9RCemnOkT/z3WIKv2t/yY=
> =DtRQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


-- 
Alex Clark · http://pythonpackages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-com/attachments/20120906/82577c40/attachment.html>