[Plone-com] design constraints

Wyn Williams heywyn at gmail.com
Wed Sep 5 11:28:17 UTC 2012

Hash: SHA1

Hello all

As somebody who is one of the decision makers as part of my job (IE I
select the systems my clients use) time to time def a big +1 to WCAG
2.0 with attention to screen readers as well on content and navigation
not just for forms.

> - looks good on Internet Explorer. We aim for decisionmakers.
> These people still run that.

I hate IE as much as the next Human (and I am sitting next to somebody
who REALLY hates it as I write this) but yes, it needs to be able to
look great on IE 7(ish) 8> there is no reason it can not have a look /
feel / design that takes advantage of the latest technologies anyway
as these can simply be disabled when Plone detects the inferior browsers.

Maybe move / list these up on Trello ?


On 09/05/2012 11:21 AM, Paul Roeland wrote:
> There are two design constraints that I'd like. I'm sure TV1 can
> cope with them, just have them out in the open.
> - accessibility, to at least WCAG2.0. This is a *must* in our
> important government/education markets, so our 'business card site'
> should comply. Not difficult to do, but puts some constraints on
> color contrast and the like. We have experts available in the Plone
> community to help test.
> - looks good on Internet Explorer. We aim for decisionmakers.
> These people still run that.
> Paul _______________________________________________ Plone-com
> mailing list Plone-com at lists.plone.org 
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-com

Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2764 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-com/attachments/20120905/73f32621/attachment-0001.p7s>

More information about the Plone-com mailing list