[Plone-com] Someone needs to step up

[Alex Clark]

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Matt Hamilton <matth at netsight.co.uk> wrote:

>
> On 4 Sep 2012, at 20:45, Alex Clark wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Matt Hamilton <matth at netsight.co.uk>wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>   This is awesome! I sent the email this morning from a train on the way
>> to spend a day on-site with a client, and check email on way home to see
>> lots and lots of discussion and people stepping up to do stuff. This is
>> great!
>>
>> I have a few bits of further information and some comments to throw in
>> the mix:
>>
>> 1) Yes as you found there is a staging site up at
>> http://plonecom.netsightdev.co.uk this is based on a buildout and
>> package developed by Chrissy as Six Feet Up, and the code is in github:
>>
>> https://github.com/cdw9/plonecom-buildout
>> https://github.com/cdw9/plonecom.theme
>>
>
>
> Can these be moved to the plone organisation?
>
>
> Probably. They were just under Chrissy to start with as she did them and
> that was the most expedient place for her to put them at the time. It was
> always planned they would be moved somewhere proper in due course.
>


How about starting them somewhere proper, then you don't have to move them
in due course :-). Seriously though, the plone and collective organizations
are THE place to be. Both are thriving. It would be great to have this
project visible in one of those organizations (probably plone).



>
>
>> please do any work in this package and then I can easily put it on the
>> staging site. I'm happy to keep hosting the staging site. If people need
>> accounts on this plone site let me know and I can add you, or bug someone
>> in IRC whom I've already given accounts to.
>>
>
>
> Can we have shell access? Where is the production site going to go?
>
>
> No, you can't have shell access to the staging site. And to be honest I
> don't think it is needed. We are primarily talking about a site for content
> and and theme. At least on day one I don't actually see us using any custom
> content types or anything like that. Maybe a few existing add-ons.  People
> can test them locally and commit to the buildout and I can re-deploy it to
> staging. Right now though we are talking content and design.
>
>

> As for where the production site goes. I don't know. I would hazard a
> guess at putting it where plone.org is if that makes sense to the AI
> team, but I guess is their call.
>


+1. In fact, I'd rather move it there now then have to worry about it
later. I am +0 on leaving it at netsight without shell access. If people
can be productive there, then it's probably fine. But we'd certainly have
access to more "devops folks" if we moved it to SFU and let the AI team
control it.



Alex




> -Matt
>
> NETSIGHT
>
> Matt Hamilton
> Technical Director
> Email
> matth at netsight.co.uk <iain at netsight.co.uk>
>
> Telephone
> +44 (0) 117 909 0901
>
>
> Web
> www.netsight.co.uk
>
> Address
> 40 Berkeley Square, Clifton
> Bristol BS8 1HU
>
> *
> *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Alex Clark · http://pythonpackages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-com/attachments/20120904/359ed02d/attachment.html>