[Plone-conference] Why nuke the 2014 site?

[T. Kim Nguyen]

Should we add a stipulation that future conference (and other PF-sanctioned
event) proposals must include having the event web site set up so it can be
(and is) transferred to the PF to ensure future access to the content?

I decided to move the PSM13 and PSM14 sites off UW Oshkosh servers (to a
Linode I run) to try to better preserve them. What could we do now to
preserve these and other sites?

    Kim


On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Chris Calloway <cbc at unc.edu> wrote:

> On 9/14/2015 7:06 AM, Jean Jordaan wrote:
>
>> The 2014 talks are nowhere on plone.org, and 2014.ploneconf.org is now
>> redirecting to 2015.ploneconf.org
>>
>
> Yes, it is not good to nuke old conference sites.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> Chris Calloway, Applications Analyst
> UNC Renaissance Computing Institute
> 100 Europa Drive, Suite 540, Chapel Hill, NC 27517
> (919) 599-3530
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plone-conference mailing list
> Plone-conference at lists.plone.org
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-conference
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/plone-conference/attachments/20150915/61f85fad/attachment.html>